🔗 Share this article

Prosecutors informed the court that police maintained reasonable suspicions indicating Stephen Yaxley-Lennon's mobile contained information relevant to acts of terrorism when they stopped him last year as he attempted to depart from the UK.

Denial to Give Device Pin

The right-wing campaigner, whose legal name is Tommy Robinson, reportedly refused to hand over his password to police, claiming it included journalist content.” This occurred after he was intercepted at the Eurotunnel on 28 July 2024.

Trial Arguments on Anti-Terror Authority

On the last day of the trial, prosecutor the prosecution argued that the anti-terror authorities used by law enforcement are designed to permit information collection. She asserted that officers had valid grounds to think the defendant continued to have links to far-right activists, even after the disbandment of the EDL organization.

While his membership of the EDL has ceased, his views have not disappeared. He is recognized for having those views and therefore it is a valid concern to think that on his telephone there may be information relevant to acts of terrorism,” she informed Westminster magistrates court.

The prosecutor added, His opinions – to which he is entitled – were not the focus for their attention on 28 July. It was his association to others who are potentially involved in illegal actions.”

Details of the Detention

The campaigner had turned up alone at the Channel tunnel in a luxury vehicle belonging to a acquaintance and was on his way to the Spanish resort of the Spanish coast with over £13,000 in a small bag, the trial was told.

The money was reportedly from a collection to offset costs from arranging a large demonstration that occurred the previous day in a London landmark.

Legal Team Submissions

The defendant, who disputes non-compliance with anti-terror laws during the encounter on 28 July of the previous year, could receive up to 90 days in prison or a possible £2,500 penalty if convicted.

His barrister, defense counsel, argued in final arguments that counter-terrorism police who detained his client had engaged in a speculative search” and that he had been unlawfully detained.

Citing testimony from police who said they contacted other organizations” after arresting him, Williamson claimed this was a allusion to the security services and that no evidence had been offered from MI5 to indicate his client was a terrorist.

He asserted the police action was biased” because it was based to a large extent on a protected characteristic.” He said that the main factor” on the decision to detain him was “‘oh look, it’s Tommy Robinson”.

He added that police had used an “extraordinary power that needs to be carefully regulated” to try to discover details that was previously available. The barrister proposed that his client journeyed to the resort frequently, which should have lessened the police concerns about him.

Legal Costs and Verdict Timing

Robinson claimed that his court expenses in the case were being covered by Elon Musk, the owner of social media and electric car companies, who has emerged as an supporter of the campaigner and lately addressed a gathering arranged by him in the capital via a livestream.

A suggested date of next Tuesday for the decision was changed by the district judge, Sam Goozee, after Williamson said his client was due to be a invitee of the Israel's administration from the midweek and would not come back until October 25.

{“I wouldn’t trouble you if this was a trip to Benidorm. I would ask him to rearrange it but he is a guest of a foreign government,” said the barrister.

The judge said he would hand down his ruling on the start of 4 November.