🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that authorities grant or withhold at their discretion. This represents the implication of proposed measures that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with potential imprisonment for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Earlier administrations had already undermined this essential right: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement extensive additional powers, which international human rights organizations had condemned as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental assaults on liberty have effectively abolished the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Using Tragedy to Justify Suppression

The latest limitations are being justified by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic assault on a Manchester mosque. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the safety of British Jews must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a justification to suppress dissent is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at genocide, you probably cannot draw the line at democratic principles," commented a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Protest

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of protest and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their time, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's truly occurring: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have characterized as systematic destruction. Its warfare have prompted the global justice body to release arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his ex-military leader.

Western popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens think Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would support a total prohibition on weapons exports to the nation, and back the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially lost the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a despicable antisemitic crime to try to suppress a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be involved in this effort. Ministers have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to continue.

People who are protesting against the destruction of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these demonstrators until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Equating Jewish identity with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a point where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment faced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of ongoing violence that have claimed tens of thousands of lives. British politicians and media outlets have barely concealed the limited value they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of discrimination in contemporary society.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by banning a specific activist group, a peaceful, anti-genocide activist collective. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, primarily for holding placards against mass killing and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; including a retired priest and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "linked with" other nations, while the sitting leader described such protests as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given extensive authority to control dissent. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears fought, suffered and sacrificed their lives to establish our liberties. We may ultimately rue how easily we permitted them to slip away.